There's a SocialLearn steering group meeting next week, and as part of the document preparation for it Martin has tried to get us thinking about potential business models;-)
So to try and get myself in the zone for mulling such things over on a dog walk, here's a list of models off the top of my head...
Advertising models
Sponsorship
To my mind, this is ad-selling as much as anything... The difficult part is getting the ad-inventory/sponsorship.
Affiliate deals (cf. PPA)
Transaction Fees (B2B)
e.g. make businesses pay for bulk operations over the platform. If the platform acts as an aggregator, it may be that the platform also pays a commission feed to data orginators as a license condition of aggregating their data?
Pay-for-access/Licensing
e.g. charge businesses who generate business on you platform; e.g. levy a license fee if they build apps that use your platform; metered access for users and/or generators of traffic? (so e.g. if you build an app that makes frequent demands of my API, I'm gonna charge you for it (maybe Twitter should do this - let other people monetise at a B2C level and charge the app builders for client access to the API at metered or bulk B2B rates?)
Data Vending & Data Related Value Add Services
A quick google also turns up the following:
"Web 2.0 Business models (Technosight)" refers to the following diagram, which is maybe also worth mulling over:
Hmm - how encouraging is it that I'm where Dion was more than 2.0 years ago?! ;-) Struggling to Monetize Web 2.0...
See also "When dot com becomes dot edu".
Now where's the dog... ;-)
PS a couple more refinements are listed here: Beyond AdSense: A Business Model Checklist.
This slideshow is also interesting...
PPS another list of models: The Long Tail Of Business Models
Tags: web2.0, business models, s:l, socialearn, sociallearn, we've changed the name again - double L again now I think
Posted by ajh59 at May 26, 2008 05:57 PMIt would be interesting to look at why potential students are willing to pay a premium for the more traditional OU courses, is it solely down to being able to offer a recognised qualification?
Posted by: Nigel Burke at May 27, 2008 02:04 AMYou missed off the classic "get bought up by Google/Microsoft/Yahoo!" which seems to be the only really successful Web 2.0 business model :-)
Posted by: Doug Clow at May 27, 2008 09:49 AM"It would be interesting to look at why potential students are willing to pay a premium for the more traditional OU courses, is it solely down to being able to offer a recognised qualification?"
Most of the discussion in this respect has been around making OER/openlearn like offerings sustainable (e.g. http://ouseful.open.ac.uk/blogarchive/008358.html and Downes: http://www.scribd.com/doc/3114809/sweden )
The OU offers several things as part of the 'commercial' package:
- formal academic credit
- SOL (Supported open learning - http://www.open.ac.uk/about/ou/p5.shtml ): personal tutor support (though not necessarily in online courses), online community/forums;
- 'time management': well structured, paced delivery through a course;
- assessment: self-, formative and summative assessment (with feedback).
I wonder how much Google would offer for the OU? Of course, Microsoft would raise a counterbid ;-)
Posted by: AJ Cann at May 29, 2008 06:11 PM